[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: NX4

Subject: Re: NX4
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:31:44 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1137918761.324704@athnrd02><Zd2dnce08_7_W0jeRVnygQ@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1138290368.983895@athnrd02> <1J8Cf.12909$C%3.10948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138302836.973848@athnrd02> <JxcCf.15031$C%3.11096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AvCf.120$s9.107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138468841.849342.191910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vNednQ2QH8gRbUbeRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1138566151.676635.129940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<proguard@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138566151.676635.129940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Today i made a test connection with one NX4 control panel using Ademco
> CIA modem and it works perfect. Everytime the connection and the
> up/download was perfect. Also the 2 call answer phone defeat function
> works perfect. Tommorow i'll try to connect with NX8 just for a test,
> but as i saw today with NX4 i believe there would not be any problem at
> all with NX8 also.

That modem is just a rebranded StarComm found here

http://www.arcelect.com/Star-Comm_low_speed_modem10-20-98.html

It also works well with ITI, Radionics and I "think" Napco

References:
- NX4
  - From: Spyros Kintzonides
- Re: NX4
  - From: EJ
- Re: NX4
  - From: Spyros Kintzonides
- Re: NX4
  - From: Chub
- Re: NX4
  - From: Spyros Kintzonides
- Re: NX4
  - From: Chub
- Re: NX4
  - From: Chub
- Re: NX4
  - From: proguard
- Re: NX4
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: NX4
  - From: proguard

Prev by Message: Re: Galaxy 512
Next by Message: ESLiminated
Previous by thread: Re: NX4
Next by thread: Re: NX4
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home