[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices

Subject: Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:34:57 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1136404492.450925.16240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <G4ydnT4bBbNY3SDenZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <ygkvf.6013$jR.5319@fed1read01> <rrydnXDJrda8QiDeRVn-vQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <CeydnficNbH4biDenZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <qswvf.31799$tl.5090@pd7tw3no> <Qkxvf.1424$R77.557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Allan Waghalter wrote:
> I have had very good luck with the Caddx 2000.  They are round so we always
> get them mounted right.  There are no adjustments and false alarms are rare.


Thanks Allan...  I'll have a look at 'em.

References:
- Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: Andrew
- Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: alarman
- Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: J Barnes
- Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
  - From: Allan Waghalter

Prev by Message: Re: Never had an alarm before but...
Next by Message: Re: NX4
Previous by thread: Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
Next by thread: Re: Reliability of glass breakage listening devices
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home