Re: Gemini P3200 - * ZONES FAULTED ***

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> So pointing out illegal activity
I have paid enough lawyers to know that I do NOT know what is legal and what
is not legal in these areas. I know I see all sorts of warnings posted like
"not responsible for windshield dammage" or "Not responsible for injuries
caused by" (fill in the blank). Well that is nice for a big company to put
there to try and protect themselves, but in legal terms it means less than
nothing. They are responsible for certain tort claims no matter what signage
they put up to the contrary. I don't if what Napco posts about their
software is used as a smoke screen, or if what they post is real policy.
Pointing out the obvious is the fact that they do nothing about it when it
is done right under their nose. Nevertheless, I am not the one doing it. I
can't make any assumptions, approvals, disapprovals or take any other
actions on Napco's behalf. I believe you believe what you saying about this
being illegal (or shady) is true, but you don't have any legal credentials
to back up that view, or do I. Napco is not a basket case or a charity case.
They are a company that can define and protect their own interests. I say
let them do it.

>interferes with "helping this guy out",
It could if he doesn't understand you have a long standing feud and he
thinks he getting sucked into something instead of simply working at fixing
a problem.

>Bass "justifies"
If the naked truth be told, how many reasons does each of have that
"justifies" some particular action that others may deem harmful, offensive
or illegal?

"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bOXlh.546170$R63.198107@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Roland Moore wrote:
>>>It's one more reason why I wouldn't ever recommend doing business with
>>>Bass
>>
>>
>> I think the poor guy just wants his alarm fixed, not a link to
>> goofysplace.
>> I say Napco can see what Bass is doing here just like everyone else can.
>> Why don't we try letting Napco deal with Napco and Microsoft deal with
>> Microsoft. What Bass is doing or not doing doesn't bother them enough to
>> bother me with it. Unless or until either of these legal entities pays me
>> to protect their interests, and gives me legal standing to do so, I say
>> let's just try and help this guy out and get his problem fixed in the
>> meantime.
>
> So pointing out illegal activity interferes with "helping this guy out",
> does it?  That's gotta be one of the most idiotic things I've seen you
> post.  It probably also how Bass "justifies" (to himself at least)
> providing his "extra service".