Re: A new twist

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds like a scam.
Personally, I wouldn't worry about it, file it in the bottom drawer.



"ABLE_1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lO2dnWxTSfs3EQnYnZ2dnUVZ_rKvnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Hi Nick,
|
| Personally I feel that I have already spent more time and efforts on this
| stupidity.  They are going to have to PROVE that I have done something
| wrong.  They can't!!!  For them to try and glean violators in <their>
state
| by information collected solely on the "net" is an insult to my
| intelligence.  They can go pound sand for all I care.
|
|
|
| >I would send this state agency a certified letter simply stating my
company
| >does not engage and has not  ever engaged in buisness in your state and
if
| >your company were ever to concider doing buisness it would only be so by
| >following all applicable codes.and any inferance to fact you may have
done
| >buisness is seen as a personal insult and will result in filing legal
| >action to see that no further interferance in your buisness is
| >created.unless an immediuate written apology is recieved.
| >
| >
| > "ABLE_1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:_KWdnT2X7JxZHwnYnZ2dnUVZ_tKjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> Hi All,
| >>
| >> Here is a new twist on the Alarm Business challenges.
| >>
| >> Yesterday I received a Certified Letter from another state that does
not
| >> even border my own.  This letter states that: "The Department of
Criminal
| >> Justice has obtained information that you may be providing central
| >> station monitoring services in <their> state."
| >>
| >> It goes on to say that: "Our records do not reflect your company being
| >> licensed to do business in <their> state.  And then continues to
explain
| >> by quoting their Codes as to what the rules are.  Along with a form for
| >> me to sign and return that states I will not engage or solicit private
| >> security services in <their> state with out the proper licensing.
| >> Basically pleading guilty to all charges.
| >>
| >> My first thought is a this is a case of mistaken identity.  But, no its
| >> worse than that .................................  I called the person
| >> that was named on the letter.  To make the conversation short he said
| >> that "his investigator" found my company name on the "internet" and
| >> determined that I could "potentially" be providing services in his
state
| >> which prompted the letter.
| >>
| >> I explained that the taxpayers in his state are paying for a lot of
bogus
| >> crap and he should have "his investigator" call me directly and explain
| >> how he made the association.  He said "his investigator" was on
vacation.
| >> I said "I'll wait." and hung up.
| >>
| >> I seems to me that someone is trying to justify there paycheck at the
| >> expense of the innocent.
| >>
| >> So what's next???  Big brother peeking in my bathroom to make sure I am
| >> using the right colored toilet paper???
| >>
| >> Anyone else getting this kind of
| >> harassments..................................... or worse????
| >>
| >> Les
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
|
|