Re: A new twist

["ABLE_1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Nick,

Personally I feel that I have already spent more time and efforts on this
stupidity.  They are going to have to PROVE that I have done something
wrong.  They can't!!!  For them to try and glean violators in <their> state
by information collected solely on the "net" is an insult to my
intelligence.  They can go pound sand for all I care.



>I would send this state agency a certified letter simply stating my company
>does not engage and has not  ever engaged in buisness in your state and if
>your company were ever to concider doing buisness it would only be so by
>following all applicable codes.and any inferance to fact you may have done
>buisness is seen as a personal insult and will result in filing legal
>action to see that no further interferance in your buisness is
>created.unless an immediuate written apology is recieved.
>
>
> "ABLE_1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:_KWdnT2X7JxZHwnYnZ2dnUVZ_tKjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here is a new twist on the Alarm Business challenges.
>>
>> Yesterday I received a Certified Letter from another state that does not
>> even border my own.  This letter states that: "The Department of Criminal
>> Justice has obtained information that you may be providing central
>> station monitoring services in <their> state."
>>
>> It goes on to say that: "Our records do not reflect your company being
>> licensed to do business in <their> state.  And then continues to explain
>> by quoting their Codes as to what the rules are.  Along with a form for
>> me to sign and return that states I will not engage or solicit private
>> security services in <their> state with out the proper licensing.
>> Basically pleading guilty to all charges.
>>
>> My first thought is a this is a case of mistaken identity.  But, no its
>> worse than that .................................  I called the person
>> that was named on the letter.  To make the conversation short he said
>> that "his investigator" found my company name on the "internet" and
>> determined that I could "potentially" be providing services in his state
>> which prompted the letter.
>>
>> I explained that the taxpayers in his state are paying for a lot of bogus
>> crap and he should have "his investigator" call me directly and explain
>> how he made the association.  He said "his investigator" was on vacation.
>> I said "I'll wait." and hung up.
>>
>> I seems to me that someone is trying to justify there paycheck at the
>> expense of the innocent.
>>
>> So what's next???  Big brother peeking in my bathroom to make sure I am
>> using the right colored toilet paper???
>>
>> Anyone else getting this kind of
>> harassments..................................... or worse????
>>
>> Les
>>
>>
>
>