[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Caddx/Ademco Downloading



I don't think the entire state of Florida did go to CP-01, only a few
regions or cities did. The DSC boys couldn't remember where the cities or
counties were, but they seemed certain it was Florida. It doesn't seem to
matter here if the panel is set exactly to CP-01 standards, unless it has
the UL CP-01 sticker you can't install it.

"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8omfh.10297$yj1.2750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I have been following those guidelines on my own for 10+ years. All my
>panels have dialer delays, aborts, way before it became a CP-01 standard.
>We did it to save money, for both our company and our clients. We started
>doing this when law enforcement started fining customers after 3 false
>alarms within 1 year. But to my knowledge, Florida hasn't adopted the CP-01
>standard as of yet.
>
> Jim Rojas
>
>
> "Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:lgmfh.8940$qp1.7415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I heard guys in a few counties and/or a few cities in Florida were
>> getting hit with that CP-01 thing too like we are here. At least that is
>> what the guys at DSC said. Is that true? If so how does that CP-01 thing
>> work in your neck of the woods?
>> And tell the fly boys you like to sunbathe in the raw and you are on your
>> back with a towel over your face and it's the little head they're seeing.
>>
>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:x5mfh.22178$%u3.11718@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Directions: I am told that I am so bald...that I am the only thing in
>>> Florida visible from space.
>>>
>>> Jim Rojas
>>>
>>>
>>> "Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:gZlfh.8718$qp1.8031@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Thanks alot!
>>>> If I can get this to work the next thing I'll need is directions.
>>>> Please point me to the nearest shrine you have for yourself so I can
>>>> begin worshiping at your feet immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:2dlfh.10291$yj1.8785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Yes, that is correct. The DL110 emulates the Hayes 2400. I got mine to
>>>>> work fine on DSC, Napco, Ademco, GE, Caddx, Radionics, plus many
>>>>> others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Rojas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:U3lfh.8072$qp1.5396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> You know I have a few of the Bosch modems from DC Security Products.
>>>>>> I have DSC, Ademco, Napco etc. panels that I download but I use a
>>>>>> separate modem for each. I never experimented to see if the Bosch (DC
>>>>>> Security Products) modem is the exact same or just slightly different
>>>>>> than the regular DC 110. In any case when I use the wrong software
>>>>>> and init string without switching the dial to the right modem it
>>>>>> never works. So I know I have been stupid all these years, but you're
>>>>>> telling me I don't need a separate MD-12 for DSC or CIA (or Hayes)
>>>>>> for Ademco (Honeywell) or a Hayes for Napco etc. I can use the DC 110
>>>>>> for all of them (if I input the correct init string)? Does it work on
>>>>>> every panel or is it a goofy work around that just works on some
>>>>>> panels?
>>>>>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Tkifh.10285$yj1.1941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>I have a few DC Security DL110 modems that work well with Ademco,
>>>>>>>Caddx, plus many, many more panels. The modem sells for $275, and its
>>>>>>>new.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim Rojas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Don" <don@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:b4ifh.5037$uY1.2709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "whppas" <u30140@uwe> wrote in message news:6a9ce516a7a30@xxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> Is this modem simular to the old Hayes I was using and I would
>>>>>>>>> maybe look on
>>>>>>>>> line for it as used.
>>>>>>>> si
>>>>>>>> doesn't ademco sell a modem that works with compass?
>>>>>>>> Isn't there a new special modem made just for this purpose that
>>>>>>>> someone was referring to in this newsgroup?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home