Re: ADT Essential Wireless Package

[J. <jsloud2001<removeme>@netscape.net>]

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:17:42 GMT, "Stanley Barthfarkle"
<sbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>"J. @netscape.net>" <jsloud2001<removeme> wrote in message
>news:u4jlc2pqvkjrc547gt333n0po5c9jm96uo@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On 28 Jul 2006 19:25:16 -0700, "Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>One central station is for residential accounts. Their other stations
>>>are for large commercial
>>>and government accounts.
>>
>> This is patently false.  All of ADT monitoring stations can monitor
>> any account in an emergency.  The system operates on a virtual
>> load-balancing network.  Rochester, Jacksonville, and Aurora have all
>> partially or completely been shut down in the past several years for
>> natural disasters.  ADT has re-routed signals each time.
>
>
>Almost correct. Indianapolis still does National Accounts as a stand-alone
>CS.
>

Wrong.  There is no monitoring center in Indy.  That's where ADT's
National Account Service Center is.  National Accounts are primarily
monitored out of Aurora, CO.