Re: Self Monitoring....

["Stanley Barthfarkle" <sbarth@xxxxxxxxx>]

You really should stick to Belgian newsgroups...can't understand a word of
your English.



<-pull@shoot> wrote in message
news:cna3i1tv1fb1u77t301g0r5nbdunh8nksg@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Monitoring by professionals is not required.
>
> The usual arguments of monitoring stations are that they are
> available all the time, they apply standard procedures with your
> authorization and some phone numbers you have to provide of persons
> they can contact and more...
>
> How do i reject theyre "not reachable" argumentation?
> When an alarm is detected i dial 2 numbers:
> - my cell phone
> - the place where the alarm is originated from, my home.
>
> Why ?
> Well when I'm not reachable for action (at the theater for instance
> or for any other reason) i redirect my alarm phone-line
> "conditionally" (line busy) to an alternative person who has been
> informed prior and agree to take action to warn police of an
> ongoing alarm and monitor theyre presence acknowledge.
>
> I can redirect the alarm phone number (and check presence) of the
> involved person:
> - with my home-phone before i leave
> - with my cell phone at any time and place;
>
> When I'm not reachable on my cell-phone, i will know exactly who is
> involved for action.
>
> I repeat for the "deaf pro's", no direct personal intervention, police
> will do it and theyre (re)action time will be monitored by a truly and
> well defined person for true information.
>
> How good will you feel when you elect an all included out of your
> control standard handling procedure by a monitoring station to protect
> your belongings?
> Think it over.
>
> Paul