Re: JIM the great DS / SD professional

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Then I stand corrected. But the wording of a quoted response seemed to
indicate he did. And since I don't see his responses, I thought so from that
wording

So I end up being the only idiot that responded.....:))) Yah got me
troll......

RHC

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Wdidnao0FPWeabneRVn-rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:_smdnYegPaUTS7neRVn-jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Well, some time ago (I think before you started to post), Jim asked
> everyone
>> NOT to respond to Wacko Willy's idiotic RFI posts. The idea was that if
> he's
>> a troll, no response might just convince him to leave. Now it's Jim
>> (apparently - because I have his posts blocked on this computer) that is
>> responding counter to his own excellent suggestion.
>>
>> But as you say, it aint worth the time is it....hmmm....so why am I
>> responding.....Damn !!....the troll caught another one
>>
>> RHC
>
> I don't show him replying in this thread
>
>