[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sprinkler Monitoring

Subject: Re: Sprinkler Monitoring
From: "Bob La Londe" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:43:48 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <IoudnSYKIsRkO-XeRVn-vg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <z9lef.4913$%o1.2027@trndny09>

"Nick Markowitz" <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:z9lef.4913$%o1.2027@xxxxxxxxxxx
> If your state has adopted ICC like Pa. then an engineer archetectct or
> similar  state registered  profesional must sign off on plan. and AHJ has
> final authority  under ICC existing buildings code on the monitoring ,
> which
> is not grandfathered which includes the shut off valve being monitored
> too.
> were a chain and lock was Ok before.

I just dealt with an inspector yesterday and he wanted both, although he
admited the chain and lock were not required if tamper was monitored.

--
Bob La Londe
http://www.YumaBassMan.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sprinkler Monitoring
  - From: Bob Worthy

References:
- Sprinkler Monitoring
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Sprinkler Monitoring
  - From: Nick Markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: Silent Knight Fire Panels
Next by Message: Re: Battery sealed in System?
Previous by thread: Re: Sprinkler Monitoring
Next by thread: Re: Sprinkler Monitoring
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home