[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems

Subject: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
From: "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 00:56:45 -0400
Newsgroups: uk.tech.electronic-security, alt.security.alarms
References: <gsk801tu0740a3uk58u8u7p2dn0igc2por@xxxxxxx> <427a5164$1_4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <rOadncxlqPZoVeffRVn-3w@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> If you look at his message again you will see the same words like HISS etc

"Hiss" is a deliberate mispronunciation (in type, no less).

> As usual you are wrong

As usual you're unwilling to admit error.

References:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: NFPA's Creation of Security Standards/Codes
Next by Message: Re: Why Don't You Like DSC? (Addressed to those that don't.)
Previous by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Next by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home