[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: It's way too early for this but

Subject: Re: It's way too early for this but
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 03:25:43 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms, comp.home.automation
References: <1116407433.148507.127030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <NPKdnR57F_6MqhbfRVn-vQ@xxxxxxxxxxx> <er2dnSKAufs7WhbfRVn-sw@xxxxxxxxxx> <1fWdnaSAvZdHdhbfRVn-3Q@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1fWdnaSAvZdHdhbfRVn-3Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> would you post this in comp.home.automation?
>> why don't you show us the same courtesy?
>
> You asking for courtesy is like Olson asking for sincerity and Nixon
> asking for honesty.


Uh-huh...  And this is what, Robert???  Another "example" of the way you
treat people that have decided not to "join in" in your ongoing flame war??

Follow-Ups:
- Re: It's way too early for this but
  - From: wkearney99
- Re: It's way too early for this but
  - From: gtg3google

References:
- It's way too early for this but
  - From: no wires showing
- Re: It's way too early for this but
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: It's way too early for this but
  - From: mikey
- Re: It's way too early for this but
  - From: Robert L. Bass

Prev by Message: Re: NFPA's Creation of Security Standards/Codes
Next by Message: DVD
Previous by thread: Re: It's way too early for this but
Next by thread: Re: It's way too early for this but
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home