Re: 20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm systems..

["Roger" <rumble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No. You didn't 'show'... you said. Very different thing. By the way, you're
stupid :-)


<-pull@shoot> wrote in message
news:139f91hvab1v58q8nqkrihenm82omi317j@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
> systems in several posts.
> I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
> more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
> By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
> headphone;
>
> Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
> theyre experience = no RFI warning.
>
> I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
> from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
> and interferences.
> I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
> are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
> (you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).
>
> I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
> error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
> level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
> communication.
> The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
> and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.
>
> WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
> data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
> comparisons to wired systems.
> Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
> theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?
>