Re: 10. Wireless unreliability upset Pro's

["Dr. Phred" <fred.spearey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Is this it, is he done? I'm sorry but for some reason I was expecting a
12 step program, er lesson.

Crash Gordon® wrote:
> Why? Because you're an idiot.
>
> If you want manufacturers responses, why not contact them directly? We can't speak for a manufacturer.
>
> BTW, the FCC does not "warranty" anything - they never have.
>
>
> <-pull@shoot> wrote in message news:hh1n719726qfe19f24590ie1bthlqqj8q4@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>>What does upset Pro's in this news group when i say that wireless
>>alarm systems are unreliable during RFI ?
>>
>>Well look at theyre childish answers (instead of providing
>>professional arguments) they try to ridicule, mono-bit/mono-lingual
>>persons language battle, they tell you everything, the most stupid
>>first, .. Usual "low level electrician behavior" who think they have
>>to battle to defend theyre position.
>>Look around when you are in the industry, fighting is a typical
>>attitude of the "lower education class" persons.
>>
>>Where are manufacturers counter arguments ?
>>Why do manufacturers not provide data about the main difference
>>between wired and wireless: the wireless data loop between sensors and
>>the control panel ?
>>Because RFI can't be resolved in the actual FCC allowed frequency
>>space, to crowded, to limited in band size. It can be used free by
>>anybody without interference and FCC warranty and control of course.
>
>