Re: 28. New readers, RF intruders in wireless alarm systems

["Roger" <rumble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I didn't trim any of it because my 4 line response was for all of the
original message posted ;-).. as is this one

"Andrew Gabriel" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42add3d6$0$38037$5a6aecb4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <dKjre.14060$jS3.9799@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Roger" <rumble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> What total rubbish! You do not understand rolling code or its true
>> purpose.
>> And as for the rest of it...delays - what a joke. You make me laugh you
>> really do. Anyone reading this diatribe should simply ignore it. Take it
>> from me that the guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
>
> The only time most of us even see it is when someone like you
> posts a 4 line response and completely fails to trim any of
> the original rubbish.
>
> --
> Andrew Gabriel