[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 34. Is monitoring required?

Subject: Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
From: "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:24:58 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <903bb1togrfpkhhcq6gqeljpagk2u0s3ki@xxxxxxx> <Hhgte.3595$iG5.1331@fed1read05> <do4bb1t3n2upl1p67mf8v0135b947ibtp4@xxxxxxx> <YMgte.9$NL4.1187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1119252638.333669.324410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0_mdnUH2NeXvdCvfRVn-jA@xxxxxxxxxxx> <tJCte.293$tG.45@trnddc05>

> Statefarm and a few others here in Florida
> are making it manditory in some cases to
> have monitoring.

That's nothing new.  Insurers have required high end residences as well as
many high risk commercial establishments to have monitored alarms for many
years.  The extent of coverage requirements vary from one underwriter to the
next though.

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

=============================>
Bass Home Electronics
2291 Pine View Circle
Sarasota · Florida · 34231
877-722-8900 Sales & Tech Support
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
=============================>

References:
- 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: -pull
- Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: Doug L
- Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: -pull
- Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: A-traq
- Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
  - From: Jim Rojas

Prev by Message: Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
Next by Message: Re: Selective Entry Delays Per Zone?
Previous by thread: Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
Next by thread: Re: 34. Is monitoring required?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home