[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...

Subject: Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
From: -pull@shoot
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:53:42 +0200
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms, uk.tech.electronic-security
References: <b8mlb1l607nmgh24bkc3jb8m4h5ocnelm6@xxxxxxx> <U0Wue.2492$%O1.1736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a7mpb11ens462ufts2ht9j9qr0ontlupmn@xxxxxxx> <qm9ve.3298$z61.92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:26 GMT, "Roger" <rumble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>If you actually bother to study the documents you will see that bands set
>aside for security equipment cannot be used for other non compatible
>equipment.

TRUE, TRUE, true.

ONLY COMPATIBLE equipment can be used and that is why audio or pure
transmitters generating RFI disturb the operation.

By the way, you don't need any alarm system, intruders are not allowed
by law and ARE NOT COMPATIBLE with normal living style.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
  - From: Roger

References:
- 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
  - From: -pull
- Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
  - From: Roger
- Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
  - From: -pull
- Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
  - From: Roger

Prev by Message: Re: ademco can lid - what's the oblong knockout for?
Next by Message: Re: 5010 and 5280tc problem
Previous by thread: Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
Next by thread: Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems...
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home