Re: 20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm systems..

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your wireless HEADPHONE? Sheesh...the proves the system you bought =
really was a piece of crap.

Paul why don't  you give it up? Move on...find another cause, like =
saving the UNspotted owl or something? You don't see what a fool you =
make yourself look like?...or maybe it doesn't matter to you.



<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:139f91hvab1v58q8nqkrihenm82omi317j@xxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
> systems in several posts.
>  I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
>  more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
>  By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
> headphone;
>=20
>  Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
> theyre experience =3D no RFI warning.
>=20
> I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
> from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
> and interferences.
>  I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
> are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
> (you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).
>=20
> I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
> error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
> level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
> communication.
>  The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
> and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.
>=20
> WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
> data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
> comparisons to wired systems.
>  Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
> theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?
>=20
>