[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 35. Is monitoring required?

Subject: Re: 35. Is monitoring required?
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:25:14 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ci4bb1du0q77fl394f9vu53lat5tl5ude2@xxxxxxx> <qLgte.8$NL4.1144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Crash Gordon®" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qLgte.8$NL4.1144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey...that's precious! A silent un-monitored alarm system.  You've attained
the highest standard of idiocy yet.


How silent can it be when he has "several low volume buzzers" installed? And
it's still odd he doesn't think wireless is reliable yet his primary
reporting method is using a cell phone

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 35. Is monitoring required?
  - From: Crash Gordon®

References:
- 35. Is monitoring required?
  - From: -pull
- Re: 35. Is monitoring required?
  - From: Crash Gordon®

Prev by Message: Re: Seeeking link for HAI OmniPro II Web-link software.
Next by Message: Re: Advice on sensors, please
Previous by thread: Re: 35. Is monitoring required?
Next by thread: Re: 35. Is monitoring required?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home