Re: 48. Regardless un-professional attempts..

["Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Pauly, you missed your calling. You obviously have good lobbying skills that
can be put to good use in the US Congress, or in the UK Parliment.

I am sure you can get a bill passed banning the use of wireless systems,
because of unwated RFI. Since most members in Congress & Parliment have no
clue to anything they pass bills on, this should be a piece of cake for
you... :)

Jim Rojas


<-pull@shoot> wrote in message
news:v03pc19d3mhrctjdls0f0tnhou4g3o1s8m@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Regardless the un-professional attempts to block my post's, Radio
> Frequency Interferences (RFI) is a evidence and succeed in blocking.
> It blocks Wireless Alarm Systems operation and alarm giving.
> Do you sell those unpredictable wireless alarm "RFI silent keys" free
> of charge or is it a natural part of the Wireless Alarm Systems?
>
> He "so called" pro's, where is the evidence of your knowledge about
> wireless data transmission techniques, this beside your specialized
> ability to use cleaning cloth and experience who boils down to your
> wet finger in the wind measurement tool?
> Where is the written engagement of manufacturers that warrant to have
> RFI sensitive free equipment?
> Why do you continue your marvelous "spattering" in the RFI rejection
> pool without arguments?
>