Re: 16. Blind purshase of Wireless alarm systems

[-pull@shoot]

On Thu, 26 May 2005 06:54:01 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:

>
>Buyers:
>- do you always purchase an equipment without having a basic
>   idea about theyre quality, performance on the major part of
>   theyre design?
>- do you never make a brand performance cross check?
>- are you considered to be to ignorant to understand and
>   make comparisons between different products when they belong to
>   the wireless type?
>
>You can't make a comparisons:
>- not because you are not initiated in that wireless
>   communication part
>- not because you have no friends who can help you in making
>   a descent choice..
>just because there is no data available. YOU have to believe
>unsupported seller statements and make your personal belongings and
>live security part of theyre convincing seller arguments without any
>backup data. That's normal business in alarm equipment.
>
> The wireless data transmission who including the receiver is the
>major difference between wireless and wired systems and when it fails:
>               all alarms are muzzled.
> Wireless is a flare,
> a lure who give illusory protection
> the sensor signal can be overwritten with an external transmitter on
>a voluntary or normal environmental frequency crowd.
>
> You cant compare between wireless and wired but one thing is sure,
>all wireless alarm data signals pass true radio waves and are not
>connected/wired individually like in a wired system.
>
>In the UK sellers tell you that theyre systems are better, they have a
>unique grade 6.. they are better of course, the others?
>In the US they say that theyre products is superb..
>In the EU the wireless alarm systems are... well ask to your seller,
>they are good advisers without any direct financial interest, they are
>pro's!
>
>Paul