Re: 17. New Readers, What does upset Pro's???

[-pull@shoot]

On Thu, 26 May 2005 06:57:08 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:

>
>What does upset Pro's in this news group when i say that wireless
>alarm systems are unreliable during Radio Frequency Interferences
>(RFI) ?
>
>Well look at theyre childish answers (instead of providing
>professional arguments) they try to ridicule, mono-bit/mono-lingual
>persons language battle, they tell you everything, the most stupid
>first, ..
> Usual "low level electrician behavior" who think they have to battle
>to defend theyre position.
>Look around when you are in the industry, fighting is a typical
>attitude of the "lower education class persons".
>
>WHERE are MANUFACTURERS COUNTER ARGUMENTS to my statement that RFI
>muzzle the receivers of theyre receiver concept contained in theyre
>wireless alarm systems.
>Why do manufacturers not provide data about the main difference
>between wired and wireless: the wireless data about the loop between
>sensors and the control panel ?
>Because it can't be resolved in the actual FCC allowed SHARED
>FREQUENCIES who oblige them to use those.
>Space is crowded with other users, limited in band with, used free
>without interference warranty....
>
>Now the pro's tend to let you  believe that there is a RFI detection
>circuit, its in fact a sensor malfunction control and it don't resolve
>the RFI problem.
>Well it don't, the receiver is still muzzled and the alarm system
>don't provide any valid output data to tell that an intruder is
>present and detected.
>
>Its now since 4 years that I first mentioned that:
>-  Wireless Alarm Systems are UNRELIABLE during
>    Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI);
>-  Theyre is no warning that the system is muzzled to dead.
>
>Finally "so called" Pro's come to the conclusion:
>1. RFI exist, interfere and can't be avoided;
>2. There is a RFI detection circuit in the "modern" wireless
>   alarm systems (???);
>3. The wireless alarm systems are working fine, no RFI detected
>   since 20+ years and 100000+ systems;
>4. They have no RFI reliability measurement tools except theyre
>   on site experience;
>5. There is no manufacturer support about that RFI subject.
>
>Even if a "unsupported by manufacturers" RFI detection exist(?) its
>strange that they have NO RFI alert/warnings.
>
>How is it possible that they are so Unprofessional. Why do they not
>call the manufacturers to support the wireless equipment RFI weak
>point?
>
>Paul