Re: The *All NEW* Robert L Bass google game!

["Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

Frank Olson wrote:
> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Q6Iye.47820$go.4299@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I suppose someone who likes to harrass a person at work or bother someones
> >employer with false accusations might find such a site handy.
> >
> > Doug L
>
>
> Robert L. Bass has got to be one of the most evil-minded and "twisted"
> individuals I've ever had the misfortune to know...  What's really sad is
> this isn't a flame...
>
> Graham spent considerable time on the phone with both Robert and myself.  At
> one point in time he even convinced me to call Robert on the phone.
> Listening to this man tell me about how his wife (Rhonda) plotted against
> him to wrest control of his "modestly successful central station alarm
> company" illicited a great deal of sympathy from me at first.  It wasn't
> until we'd actually finished our conversation that a sudden though struck
> me...  "There are two sides to every story"...
>
> The "other side" took a while to piece together, but if you look hard
> enough, Robert does provide frequent and many "clues".  Rhonda was
> "subborned" to a job as a central station operator which required her
> attendance for 10 to 12 (and sometimes 18) hours a day.  She quite obviously
> never received so much as a "thank you" from the man whom she had sworn to
> "stick by", and probably started feeling like she'd signed on for something
> a whole lot more than her wedding vows called for.  Indeed, a number of
> posts (from Robert's own keyboard) seems to indicate that he's:
>
> First - the type to take a family member "for granted", and
> Second - that any deviation in loyalty or "personal trust" merits the most
> vicious and hurtful of responses.  (He's frequently been seen to post the
> most derogatory statements concerning his marriage to a woman that had
> sacrificed a good deal to try and keep things together as well as bearing
> him a couple of fine sons and putting up with his rather ego-centric
> persona.)
>
> He says "she stabbed me in the back"...  She obviously had good reason.  I
> wonder why she stopped at just his back, though??


She obviously wasn't trying to seriously harm him.  She was aiming much
too high to hit his heart.   And anyway ..... She would have needed a
sword, an XRay of his ass and a magnifying glass to reach it.