Re: Napco 1000 panel

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, once again, we see a classic case of political pandering on the part
of the current Liberal government !! This government is so desperate for
solutions, they actually believe the banning of legally owned and registered
handguns will solve the problem of Toronto gun violence. Do something; do
anything; but DO something seems to be the politically expedient approach to
dealing with the problem. Sounds familiar; they used the same dishonest
approach to sell the long gun registry ! But by going to this extreme, they
are also shooting themselves in the foot (no pun intended). If they ever
wanted more than token compliance with the long gun registry, proving once
and for all that registration TRULY does lead to confiscation, is no way to
encourage ordinary Canadians to register their long guns...

It also seems to escape these moral simpletons that the 250,000 highly
regulated owners of some one half million legal handguns are NOT and NEVER
will be any kind of problem. But they certainly are an easy target, and
convenient political fodder to use to appease the urban masses in metro
centres during an election campaign. Rather than deal with the very real
source of illegal firearms coming through such places as the Ackwesasne
indian reservation at Cornwall, Ontario, and the difficult political fallout
from that approach, they simply choose to shift the problem to an easier and
far safer target. The Liberal government was told 30 years ago by various
organizations that this problem would eventually happen if they didn't start
to deal with the real issue of smuggled firearms, but chose to turn a blind
eye even back then (I myself testified at a Parliamentary subcommittee on
the subject back in the early '80's and that testimony is a matter of public
record in Hansard). And by refusing to allow Canadian border guards to be
armed, they are ensuring that no one who appears threatening, and who may
well be armed, will ever be stopped as they should be.

Nothwithstanding the fact that the confiscation of legally owned private
property with no or woefully inadequate compensation  is morally
reprehensible, they also plan as well to dedicate more police forces to
ensuring compliance with the ban (the number they're kicking around is about
200 officers...) So a large number otherwise legal and honest handgun owners
who for reasons of civil disobedience choose not to allow their guns to be
stolen by the government will be put in the uncomfortable position of
confrontation with those same police agencies which they so long have
supported and worked with. So if for reasons of civil disobedience, some
owners choose not to give up their sidearms, what can we expect...a visit
from your local friendly SWAT team ?? What a waste of police resources !!

The Liberal government has proven they are not only morally corrupt, but
also intellectually and creatively bankrupt !! They are one bloody sad bunch
! And the other parties see little wrong with this approach, or if they do,
don't have the integrity to say it like it is....

Cripes, some times I am ashamed to be a Canadian ! While I remain strongly
opposed to capital punishment, I'm beginning to think it really should be
brought back for politicians who betray the trust we put in them..

RHC

"mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dnqqf7$qst$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reminds me of Nazi Germany. I wonder how much of this we are going to
> tolerate.
> First you register the guns, then you confiscate them. You watch these
> Liberal bastards spin
> now... they'll somehow bring the NRA in to this, mark my words.
> Sleazebags.
> It's about time we give the West a chance to run this fucking country but
> still I see the
> same retards putting up the same lawnsigns for the same crooks.
> We deserve what we get.
>
> "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:orWnf.1987$PQ3.497372@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> No, you aint ...;)))  I got your email, but the attachment was too large.
>> However, Allan W sent it to me and I got it Ok for some reason from him.
>>
>> Thanks to Jim Rojas, Jim (alarminex), Frank, and the others who
>> responded.
>> BTW, what is it with all you guys and your anti- Canadian comments. I
>> know
>> we probably deserve it with that idiot Prime Minister of ours and his
> stupid
>> electioneering. But don't judge us all by that fool.
>>
>> This twit has declared he's going to get "handguns off our street" by
> making
>> legal ownership a criminal offence (no kidding). He's going to ban
>> private
>> ownership, and force us (me) to sell my handguns back to the government,
> as
>> if taking my guns is somehow going to stop smuggling. Talk about shifting
>> the blame for inaction on something they were told would happen 30 years
>> ago.
>>
>> If I don't comply, there's a 10 year prison sentence awaiting me. I
>> wonder
>> if they have internet access in prison....:))
>>
>> RHC
>>
>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:OuNnf.17206$hB6.13889@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > What do I look like, chopped liver? You know I have all the manuals...
> :)
>> >
>> > Jim Rojas
>> >
>> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:9THnf.1200$El.186920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Does anyone have the programming sheets for a Napco 1000 panel they
> could
>> >> e mail to me ? Also, any comments about this old bird by anyone
> familiar
>> >> with it !!
>> >>
>> >> RHC
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> >> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>