Re: Rogers dropping usenet

["petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

even if I really dislike anything from bell,I would do the same thing..

if that doesn't ring them a "bell" ;-) nothing will


"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
ys2dnZZcm8ZVpQ_enZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Rogers has certainly struck a nerve locally with this one ! Other
> newsgroups are full of angry people looking for other alternatives to get
> their newsgroups back ! I suspect it's another example of the "bean
> counters" controlling things (obviously it's not generated through their
> Marketing department unless they are all idiots !!) I wouldn't be
> surprised if the bad press causes them to rethink their short sighted
> decision in this matter.
>
> Personally, I'm not waiting ! Within the next couple of days, I'm
> converting to high speed DSL which actually saves me a ton of money since
> I already have a dial up service from Sympatico in addition to the Rogers
> cable service. And I intend to tell them in no uncertain terms why I'm
> switching when I call them later the same day....
>
> RHC
>
> "petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3Gqkf.36007$i9.786955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> when you already pay for an internet service,being asked to pay for a
>> service that you already had is not what I call ok...
>>
>> its like if you are asked for money when you use a fuel pomp to pay the
>> expense of the electricity to pump the fuel..
>
>
>
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>