[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: For Robert

Subject: Re: For Robert
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:13:52 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <9V%Me.22842$Rm3.21848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SW4Ne.14294$xW.951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:SW4Ne.14294$xW.951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:9V%Me.22842$Rm3.21848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Robert drops out again when asked to answer questions. A defense move
that
> > he has shown more often recently. Goes away for awhile and hopes no one
> will
> > remember his accusations, or the questions asked of him, when he
returns.
> >
> >
>
> Maybe Robert will just go away, period........
>
> Norm Mugford

You know you don't really mean that, without him this place would be boring

Follow-Ups:
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Norm Mugford

References:
- For Robert
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Norm Mugford

Prev by Message: Re: Surge Protection?
Next by Message: Re: avoiding being "locked out"
Previous by thread: Re: For Robert
Next by thread: Re: For Robert
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home