Re: RF light switch

[nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)]

"wkearney99" <wkearney99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> > > much of what it says applies equally well to the typical residence.
>> >
>> >I disagree.  An office building is much more hostile to RF than a
>residence.
>>
>> It depends on location. There are countries where single residences have
>> many of the things you list - concrete houses are common in Europe - metal
>> studs are common in South America. And there are many high rise (and high
>> priced) residential buildings in US cities that have all of the things you
>> list. Stucco is common in California.
>
>I didn't say it wasn't possible, I disagreed with your broad generalization
>that it's equal.

And I disagree with your deliberate distortion and mischaracterization of my
post. I did not, in any way, imply it was equal. I said "much" of it
applies.