[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Standalone xPL Hub Summary
- Subject: RE: Standalone xPL Hub Summary
- From: "Tony Tofts" <tony@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:59:44 +0100
> I don't think so -- as a schema type, it would look like
> hbeat.probe or config.probe.
If this came about, I feel this would be a change to the fundamentals of
xpl, something that was agreed couldn't be played with
I'm sure we won't need to do this, if we did then I (for one) would be very
unhappy about it
Just thought I'd better make my own position clear on this point i.e. stick
my oar in ;-)
Regards
Tony
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|