The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Hub Discussion



> > Keep the hub simple and separate, and newbies will be able to see
> > what's going on much more clearly. And I think the
> requirements would be less confusing.
>
> Amen - simple and separate -- great summary :-)

It seems that most people are voting for the separate hub approach.

I'm happy to release a hubless V3 library and go back to the old way of
doing things.

If we agree, for example, that on Windows the hub service should have
the service name of "xplhub", an app can easily check for whether
a hub
is installed and warn the user if one is not found.

Likewise, an app can try binding to 3865 and warn the user if it doesn't
detect a hub.

Regards,

John



xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.