The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: xPLMediaNet Seems to Work!


  • Subject: Re: xPLMediaNet Seems to Work!
  • From: "Mal Lansell" <mlansell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:57:36 -0000



--- In ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx, "Tony Tofts" <tony@x> wrote:
> > It depends on the details of how VideoLan works as a server -
> > I've only really looked at it as a client so far.
>
> Hope you have better luck getting streaming to work than I did!
>

Gulp! That sounds ominous :-(


> I've added a new module type to xplmedianet "helper"
>
> A helper provides a shared function, that can be loaded multiple
times with
> different parameters (but all called thru a standard interface
call)
>
> E.g. a tags helper processes a file and returns id3/flac/ogg tag
details (or
> uses a folder/file format)
>
> The media scanner would use this to get the track information for
the
> database
>
> A browse module would use it so that when a client requests a
track to play,
> it can return the track info on the fly (as it has no database)
>
> The ability to load multiple versions (actually all modules can be
loaded
> multiple times if appropriate) means you could specify different
tag options
> for different sources using the same tag reader module
>

That should save a lot of coding (or at least, a lot of cutting and
pasting!)

Are these modules dlls, or individual processes?  How are they
communicating with each other?

Mal











xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx

xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.