[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: new X10 component: medusa-cm11
- Subject: RE: Re: new X10 component: medusa-cm11
- From: "Tony Tofts" <tony@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:07:45 -0000
> > But
> > device=A1,A2,C3,F5 is also syntactically correct.
> >
>
> Not from the point of view of the X10 protocol.
X10.basic also allows the use of pseudo housecodes Q thru Z (and
theoretically device codes 17 thru 99 for _all_ house codes), so matching
the syntax of x10 commands was never really the aim
The use of A1, B3 was considered acceptable and is the x10 "xpl
protocol" in
use in all current app's.
Basically how the app handles it is up to the programmer, but I would
expect
(in the case of A1, B3) to see two x10.confirm messages.
X10 confirm is nothing other than a message received and processed, it in
no
way suggests that the command was sucessful or not.
Having said all that, the x10.basic documentation could probably do with
more clarification in these areas.
Regards
Tony
xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe: ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe: ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|