[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ports
- Subject: Re: Ports
- From: "Mal Lansell" <mlansell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:31:24 +0100
- References: <FRNT8373C5620D@frontier.co.uk>
Oh - I thought there might be some gotcha or other. Anyway, I suppose I
might as well make my code use a 50000+ one, just to be the same as the
rest
of you ;-)
Mal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Tofts" <tony@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_xpl] Ports
>
> > Now I'm back from my hols, it's time to set up the website
> > and finish testing my xpl'd rf receiver. One point still
> > bothering me is why the docs suggest that xpl apps should
> > listen on port 50000+. What is wrong with just letting
> > winsock choose an available port automatically?
>
> Nothing particularly, any should work.
>
> 50000+ was chosen as it's in the range of 'freely available' ports.
>
> Regards
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com
http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
> To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
> To Subscribe: ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> To Unsubscribe: ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|