[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Advanced Details of xPLRioNet v3.8 and a Request
- Subject: RE: Advanced Details of xPLRioNet v3.8 and a
Request
- From: steve.cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:03:31 +0100
Personally I use the b) option with my mp3's. Potential problem might be
though that the wav files are in c:\ or c:\music and you don't have either
a folder or the folder within a folder layout.
The problem I can see with c) is that the length of filename may get quite
big. This would present a problem if you want to burn backups of your
music to DVD and want to follow the default standards, I have seen warnings
about filename lengths when burning before but don't know what the maximum
standard length should be.
S.
"Tony Tofts"
<tony@xplhal. To: <ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx>
com> cc:
Subject: RE: [ukha_xpl] Advanced Details of xPLRioNet v3.8 and a
Request
17/08/2004
14:40
Please
respond to
ukha_xpl
> Wav will be added this week
Just realised WAV doesnt seem to support any tags....
This leaves a few options:
a) have filename as track name (and have no album/artist)
b) as 'a' + use containing folder as album and it's containing folder as
artist
c) have a filename that has a specific format e.g.
trackno-artist-album-track.wav
Anyone have any thoughts? is there a convention for this sort of thing?
Thanks
Tony
xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com
http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe: ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe: ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|