[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bogus UID xx000000
- Subject: Re: Bogus UID xx000000
- From: mark_harrison_uk2
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:47:00 +0000
Kevin,
It sounds sensible.
I have to admit that my programs tend to work on source rather than
UID, but I'm happy for the spec to be modified as you suggest.
Regards,
Mark
--- In <a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=BJvLXsTum-FQzHNZmdPDGxJkXJ1AmoffrTMjX0zlaoVFG5wlliARz7Fn2IlBqWQ-ZxLVsrzRPv39dYy004nNdhLhh8YARg">xAP_developer@xxxxxxx</a>,
"Kevin Hawkins" <lists@u...>
wrote:
>
> I have been looking at some xPL /xAP bridging issues and I would
like to
> suggest that a UID of xx000000 be allocated a meaning of 'does not
support
> UID'. Really this comes about because when messages are sourced
from xPL
> they have no UID and so an artificial one has to be generated -
rather than
> some laborious allocation table for every xPL source I think
allocating this
> meaning clarifies and simplifies the issue. Therefore there may be
many
> different sources using the same UID of xx000000.
>
> 00xxxxxx and xx0000xx are already reserved in the xAP spec. As is
xxFFFFxx.
>
> The first two digits I think should still represent the network -
so a
> normal UID would be FF000000 - or actually because this is a remote
network
> (bridged) maybe it should be FE000000 or something. The network ID
may have
> to be different to route messages.
>
> Any comments ??
>
> Kevin
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|