Re: xAP on ACE support needed

[mark_harrison_uk2]

Like lightning, Mark H returns from a superb long weekend in France,
and dives into the fray :-)

I'll mail him.

M.

--- In <a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=mrXB0h9e9PT2pRfWo9BdNkhXw7Y27tlz9DipXjYXK8GWYOdUXZxDutgQVJ1XUD9M3EppBANy0JuYg0ua7x0T6ppEZMZOm9Q">xAP_developer@xxxxxxx</a>,
"Patrick Lidstone"
<patrick@l...> wrote:
> --- In <a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=mrXB0h9e9PT2pRfWo9BdNkhXw7Y27tlz9DipXjYXK8GWYOdUXZxDutgQVJ1XUD9M3EppBANy0JuYg0ua7x0T6ppEZMZOm9Q">xAP_developer@xxxxxxx</a>,
Stuart Booth <lists@s...>
wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 May 2003 09:23:49 +0100, steve.cooper@u... wrote:
> >
> > >I enquired with Dan on the ACE list about xAP support,
details
of
> his
> > >response below.
> >
> > I know Kenneth Watt would be very interested in this too. He was
> > asking Patrick and myself about this a few weeks back, but I had
to
> > admit that it's something that's way down my own priority list.
>
> Yes, I agree it's important. I have to admit that I've never even
> looked at ACE...
> I think what he means by the "exe" business is that you
could build
a
> standalone binary which bridges xAP and ACE? I can't see any reason
> offhand why he shouldn't be able to build xAP support into ACE
using
> the ActiveX as it stands - although I'd need to come to an
> arrangement re. licencing. Perhaps time for Mark H. to
> initiate/reopen the dialogue?
>
> Patrick