The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Further to my ADSL Faceplate Question



I'd be more concerned t'other way round - radio transmitter causing
interference with my adsl !!! ;o)

Simon

----- Original Message -----
From: Jim (List)
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: 12 January 2011 18:13
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Further to my ADSL Faceplate Question



I'm also Amateur licensed and not had a problem.

Granted I don't do much HF, but never tied any interference to the ADSL
line
(and it's direct into the shack!).

If you are worried about radiation, try using shielded cable (IIRC STP
network cable is fine for the job).

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Tracey Gardner
Sent: 12 January 2011 08:21
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Further to my ADSL Faceplate Question

Many thanks to Jim and Simon for their suggested faceplates.

However I have realised that these will only extend the unfiltered ADSL
signal to my Node 0 and in doing so will probably radiate all kinds of
nasties which would interfere with my amateur radio hobby.

In view of that would I be better having an ADSL faceplate followed by a
simple router at the point of cable entry and extending the ADSL via a CAT5
cable that I have going from the entry point to my Node 0?
I assume that this would not radiate as many nasties as extending the
unfiltered ADSL to my Node 0 as the the CAT5 feed to my Node 0 would be
balanced and should radiate very little?

If that is the case, have we got any simple router recommendations, please?

Many thanks

Tracey

------------------------------------


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.