Re: Do I Really Need To Run Coax?

["Michael Hims" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It does yes, but I was merely using this as an example to show that
with th=
at sort of technology becoming cheaper and cheaper then doesn't it do away
=
with using yet another type of cable.

Michael


From: Tracey Gardner=20
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 9:38 AM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Do I Really Need To Run Coax?


=20=20
Hello Mike

It does actually say CAT6 cables not CAT5 and a maximum of 30m, which is=20
easily eaten up in a fair sized property?

Regards

Tracey

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Michael Hims" <michael@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:13 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Do I Really Need To Run Coax?

Hi,

I'm carrying out the final specs of my HA wiring plan and I've noticed
that=
=20
co-ax has been repeatedly suggested for TVs on here.

With HDMI over Cat5 convertors coming in at sub =A320 now=20
(http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/search/productdetail.jsp?sku=3DAV19971)
do I=20
really need to run co-ax? Or have I missed the point? Just seems extra
mone=
y=20
to run yet another cable type when there are already cables that will be
ru=
n=20
to support HD video.

Cheers,

Mike

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------