The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Fw: OT : XBMC - Cheapest "Mini PC" to use ?


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: If building a house would you use X-10?


  • Subject: Re: If building a house would you use X-10?
  • From: "msgindia" <marksgraves@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:28:16 -0000

Thanks Phil,

I'm thinking that when I'm retired one of my hobbies will be to keep adding
automation to the house.  So, I do what to do it right - the first time.  I
appreciate your ideas.

Mark

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Phil Harris" <phil@...> wrote:
>
> If you're doing it as a bit of something to do then by all means use
X10 but
> if you're doing it to actually do a proper job of it then go with
something
> like C-Bus...
>
> You *CAN* get X10 to be reliable (I did) but it is very easy to screw
up a
> nicely working install by plugging in some built-down-to-a-price power
> supply for some random piece of kit...
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> > Of msgindia
> > Sent: 06 December 2009 13:06
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: [ukha_d] If building a house would you use X-10?
> >
> > I've been planning my retirement home for a while now and was
thinking
> > that I'll have a unique opportunity of being able to install some
> > things that would be too much trouble in a completed house.  If
you
> > were in the same boat would you use X-10 or maybe something else
like
> > home-run cabling with centrally located relays/dimmers?  What do
you
> > see as pluses and minuses (besides the cost of wire)?
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > signature database 4664 (20091206) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature
> database 4664 (20091206) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>




------------------------------------


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.