[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: dimmable CFL
I think that one applies to people as well...
A few simple HA rules wouldn't go amiss though - a guide on the road to
enlightenment and improved WAF.
Phil Harris wrote:
>
> And rule #2 ... "If it's an annoying piece of sh*te then it
doesn't
> deserve
> to be in existence." :-D
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>]
> > On Behalf Of Mal Lansell
> > Sent: 30 September 2007 10:47
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] dimmable CFL
> >
> > That breaks #1 in my HA rulebook - "If you have to explain
> > how it works, it's not working".
> >
> > Phil Harris wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Those things would be a complete pain in the arse to live
> > with never
> > > mind use under a HA system ... You have to flick the damn
things on
> > > and off a number of times in (reasonably) quick succession
> > to set the brightness.
> > >
> > > I'd rather use candles! :-D
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|