Re: [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower

[Ben McCormack <yahoogroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have had a Quartz shower (pumped) for about 4 years now. Father in
Law also has one.

Very happy, no issues

Ben


On 7 Sep 2007, at 11:10, Rob Mouser wrote:

> The quartz have no flow control, just on and off. Never seen it as
> a problem but then I have a policy of not letting small children
> into my house :-).
> Don't know about the Axis but the website is pretty comprehensive.
>
> Rob
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx on behalf of Ho Yin Ng
> Sent: Fri 07/09/2007 10:32
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
>
> I thought the Quartz was the one with the single round control? The
> Axis is
> the one with the vertical column with a number of buttons.
>
> I was not aware that there is no flow control. Trying to think
> whether there
> is any disadvantage in this ... for having a shower or filling up
> the bath.
>
> Does the Axis have any flow control? Sounds a bit strange really, what
> happens if I have a small child and they don't want the water so
> powerful?
>
> Though I won't have 3.5bar.
>
> The Grohe units all need min 3 bar.
>
> They look good and I like the idea of having a remote switch but
> having no
> flow control is a real turn off.
>
> Ho yin
>
> On 06/09/2007, Rob Mouser <groups@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Yep I have two. Both with remote switches, both un-pumped
> versions fed
> > by a 3.5 bar whole house pump. They IMHO are absolutely
> brilliant, the
> > best shower I've ever had, anywhere.
> > I stay in a lot of hotels, lots of them with supposed "super
doper"
> > power showers but nothing matches the ones at home.
> > They also look the dogs danglies, we have the Quartz units but
> have used
> > the Axis heads as I think they are aesthetically nicer. Just that
> nice
> > round control, with a nice LED :-p and a head.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:
> > ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
> > > Of Paul Gale
> > > Sent: 06 September 2007 14:54
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
> > >
> > > The other option is a Grohe Grohterm wireless system - more
> expensive
> > > than the Aqualisa controller though but I think it has more
> features.
> > > Both are a bit plasticy though :(
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:
> > ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > > Behalf
> > > > Of Ho Yin Ng
> > > > Sent: 06 September 2007 12:57
> > > > To: ukha_d;uk_selfbuild@xxxxxxx<uk_selfbuild%
> 40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > > > Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have one?
> > > >
> > > > I am thinking of installing one to a combi with 1.5 bar
of
> dynamic
> > > > pressure.
> > > >
> > > > Plus putting in a wireless remote switch. The only
problem is
> they
> > > > don't have a valve with a built in diverter so I will
have to
> > install
> > > > an additional diverter so that it can fill my bath.
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone share any experience they have had with it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Ho yin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>