[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: EIB versus CBUS
... xAP, I keep meaning to get into it ... next year, maybe, when
we've got the house into a state we can move into ... there's a lot
of good stuff about, which it would be good to draw into any HA set-
up ...
Chris
PS: we spent the day snagging gutters ... fixing leaks, in others
words, three-floors up, nervous as hell, and with a 50% success
rate ... ie: need to do it again tomorrow ...
On 6 Oct 2007, at 17:23, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> On reflecting on my last post I guess it comes over as veering OT and
> yet again campaigning for xAP. That wasn't the intent... I was trying
> to convey that creating HA interaction inside a single manufacturers
> product range is usually very easy and it's only when you step outside
> of their world that things become more challenging, particuarly as the
> information becomes richer eg html, XML, TV listings, databases, music
> ,pictures and video etc. Within that context was the message that
> whichever system you choose you should be either happy with its
> inbuilt
> capabilities or have a route to expand it as your needs demand.
>
> I would still be interested on the 'resilience' aspect that Chris
> cited
> as for me C-Bus is first rate. If it's a physical build quality I
> can't
> sensibly comment as I haven't experienced EIB or Idratek but C-Bus
> again
> seems really well built. If it's technical I'm interested to know what
> more these alternative systems could offer.
>
> Lastly after using C-Bus for a while now - yes, there are some
> things I
> just wish they'd done differently, some of which might have made the
> product slightly more expensive but there you go.....I'm sure that's
> true whatever system you put in.
>
> Kevin
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|