The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Fw: [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this channel please try again later.


  • Subject: Fw: [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this channel please try again later.
  • From: Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:39:37 +0000

Must admit, I dont have any interest in HD - half the stuff (if not
more)=20
Sky show on the HD channels is only SD anyway=20

Even then - =A340/month still isnt worth it. We're just subsiding the=20
Football league

Series link stuff will be there soon for Freeview and Topfield and Humax=20
devices (supposedly the best) will have these features. Might not be as=20
slick as Sky, but free. Nice they have Component out too :-)

G.

Gareth Cook
IT Architect / Project Manager, SWG Sales
IBM SWG Sales - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
email: g@xxxxxxx

=20
----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 04/01/2007 15:37 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Today 14:43

.
Subject:
.
RE: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this channel=20
please try again later.
.
Category:



I've still not seen a system that rivals Sky+ though (maybe apart from=20
Tivo - but that had it's limitations). Would be interesting to see what=20
you think if you do go this route. I do like the HD channels though with=20
Sky HD - getting better all the time.

Paul.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf=20
Of
> Gareth Cook
> Sent: 04 January 2007 12:35
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this
> channel please try again later.
>=20
> Well, ive had enough of forking out =A340/month for sky+
>=20
> A Topfield 5800PVR Freeview for =A3230 and no sub would seem a good
swap =
-
> EPG not as good but there are plugins to use the series link data
the=20
BBC
> are trialling.
>=20
> Tempting
>=20
> G.
>=20
>  Gareth Cook
>  IT Architect / Project Manager, SWG Sales
>  IBM SWG Sales - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
>  Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
>  email: g@xxxxxxx
>=20
>=20
> ----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 04/01/2007 12:34 -----
>=20
> Discussion
> Main Topic
>=20
> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Today 12:12
>=20
> .
> Subject:
> .
> RE: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this
channel
> please try again later.
> .
> Category:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I've never seen the problem due to weather in the 8 years or so
I've=20
used
> Sky/Sky+/Sky HD.
>=20
> I have seen quite a few problems with boxes locking up though=20
(especially
> the HD box) - but I'm pretty sure this is down to the box over
heating=20
as
> it's in Node0 with lots of PC's and amps etc - gets VERY warm in
there.
> Directing a desk fan at the box has cured the problem so far.
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of
> > Maccy
> > Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault
with
> this
> > channel please try again later.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Ho Yin Ng wrote:
> > > Haven't had Sky for long - does this stuff happen a lot?
> > > What load of tosh!
> >
> > With torrential rain, yes.....especially if you have a zone 1
dish.=20
Why
> > Sky don't provide larger dishes as standard I don't know.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.