RE: [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this channel please try again later.

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The SD stuff is only on Sky One HD - the other channels ARE HD as far
as I'=
ve seen so far - BBC is getting much better and showing lots more - really
=
does make a difference over SD. Film channels, Nat Geographic etc are good
=
too but limited programming.

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Gareth Cook
> Sent: 04 January 2007 15:40
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this
> channel please try again later.
>=20
> Must admit, I dont have any interest in HD - half the stuff (if not
more)
> Sky show on the HD channels is only SD anyway
>=20
> Even then - =A340/month still isnt worth it. We're just subsiding the
> Football league
>=20
> Series link stuff will be there soon for Freeview and Topfield and
Humax
> devices (supposedly the best) will have these features. Might not be
as
> slick as Sky, but free. Nice they have Component out too :-)
>=20
> G.
>=20
>  Gareth Cook
>  IT Architect / Project Manager, SWG Sales
>  IBM SWG Sales - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
>  Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
>  email: g@xxxxxxx
>=20
>=20
> ----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 04/01/2007 15:37 -----
>=20
> Discussion
> Main Topic
>=20
> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Today 14:43
>=20
> .
> Subject:
> .
> RE: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this channel
> please try again later.
> .
> Category:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I've still not seen a system that rivals Sky+ though (maybe apart from
> Tivo - but that had it's limitations). Would be interesting to see
what
> you think if you do go this route. I do like the HD channels though
with
> Sky HD - getting better all the time.
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of
> > Gareth Cook
> > Sent: 04 January 2007 12:35
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with
this
> > channel please try again later.
> >
> > Well, ive had enough of forking out =A340/month for sky+
> >
> > A Topfield 5800PVR Freeview for =A3230 and no sub would seem a
good swa=
p -
> > EPG not as good but there are plugins to use the series link data
the
> BBC
> > are trialling.
> >
> > Tempting
> >
> > G.
> >
> >  Gareth Cook
> >  IT Architect / Project Manager, SWG Sales
> >  IBM SWG Sales - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
> >  Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
> >  email: g@xxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 04/01/2007 12:34 -----
> >
> > Discussion
> > Main Topic
> >
> > ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Today 12:12
> >
> > .
> > Subject:
> > .
> > RE: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical fault with this
channe=
l
> > please try again later.
> > .
> > Category:
> >
> >
> >
> > I've never seen the problem due to weather in the 8 years or so
I've
> used
> > Sky/Sky+/Sky HD.
> >
> > I have seen quite a few problems with boxes locking up though
> (especially
> > the HD box) - but I'm pretty sure this is down to the box over
heating
> as
> > it's in Node0 with lots of PC's and amps etc - gets VERY warm in
there.
> > Directing a desk fan at the box has cured the problem so far.
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behal=
f
> > Of
> > > Maccy
> > > Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] SKY - There is a technical
fault with
> > this
> > > channel please try again later.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Ho Yin Ng wrote:
> > > > Haven't had Sky for long - does this stuff happen a
lot?
> > > > What load of tosh!
> > >
> > > With torrential rain, yes.....especially if you have a zone
1 dish.
> Why
> > > Sky don't provide larger dishes as standard I don't know.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20