The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT : Dig Photo Frame recommend ?



Gareth,

Stay clear of the very cheap ones - I got some and sent them back.  The
Cib=
ox one was especially bad - the aspect scaling was way off and the screen
w=
as dull and blurry.

I can recommend the Kodak frames for that sort of money.  Got some as
prese=
nts back in summer - PC World/Currys had them on offer for =A369.99 for a
7=
" widescreen.  Nice crisp screen, not too grainy close up  Some useful
feat=
ures - eg timer for on/off, backlight level adjust, mp3 and mp4, although
f=
rame is basic black plastic.
You should be able to get a 7" for =A370.

BTW If you do get one I found pics looked best if you resize and crop to
48=
0 x 270 and increase colour saturation around 10-20% and then sharpen.

Regards

Simon

----- Original Message -----=20
From: Gareth Cook=20
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Sent: 12 December 2007 19:49
Subject: [ukha_d] OT : Dig Photo Frame recommend ?


After a couple of cheapy photo frames as a stocking filler.

eBuyer font have their cheap units anymore - but perhaps a 480 lines res.=
=20
unit for about =A370 ?

Looking for inspiration !

G.

Gareth Cook
IT Architect / Project Manager, SWG Sales Europe
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
email: g@xxxxxxx

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number=
=20
741598.=20
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3A=
U

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



=20=20=20

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.