Re: Wireless routers...

["Tim Hawes" <timsyahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On reflection, perhaps I could've worded that better... ;-)

I'll toddle over to the forums and have a browse. It sounds unlike
Draytek to drag their feet - I'd always heard/thought they were more
proactive than that.

Thanks for the feedback though, maybe I'll hold off for a bit.

Cheers,

Tim.



On 4/10/07, White, Peter <peter.white@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's almost a compliment, thanks Tim :-)
>
> The problems seem to be restricted to the 2800VG's, and the support
from
> DrayTek was fairly woeful, just getting me to try various firmware
flashe=
s,
> none of which were specifically released for this problem, which is
well
> documented (basically the wireless performance practically stops dead
as
> soon as there's any serious traffic).
>
> I've yet to find a new wireless router that everyone seems to agree
on.
>
> Pete
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Hawes [mailto:timsyahoo@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 April 2007 19:53
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Wireless routers...
>
> Oh bugger :-((
> I was hoping the "poor performance" was from some numpties
that didn't
> really know what they were doing, but having someone on here confirm
it i=
s
> disappointing. Maybe I'm better off with a separate access point in
that
> case, there was a 3Com wireless router at ebuyer for =A325 recently...
>
> All my wireless devices are "b" or "g" so moving
over to "a" would be a p=
ain
> :-(
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.