The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Cat5e and rg6 for newbuild


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: HTPC Chassis


  • Subject: RE: Re: HTPC Chassis
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:06:17 -0000

> I have tried on-board and separate graphics - TBH the systems
> I have been building for friends are really just to display
> on standard 1368*768 panels, so graphics hasn't been too much
> of an issue. Getting the correct number of USB2 Headers,
> 1394, SPDif etc. has proved more of a headache - especially
> when trying to keep the cost down.

I use a Gigabyte mobo in my HTPC which has Nvidia 6150 graphics integrated
and it will do component video at 720p or 1080i which is nice (so it's easy
to route to both an LCD TV and a video projector with just an active
splitter) ...

> Couple that with the "Churn rate" of mobos - you leave it 3
> months between builds and the mobo you used is now obsolete,
> makes for a difficult life.

Ahhhh ... Norton Ghost is your friend for this kind of stuff. Whenever I
build a PC now I always create a 3Gb partition which I stick on all the
required drivers and - when the base install of windows and office (if
needed) is fully installed, registered and patched - I Ghost off a copy of
the install to that partition. That way it's a piece of the proverbial to
recover a fubarred machine. If you're intelligent at the outset and do
stuff
like pointing My Documents and the default location for the Outlook data
files to another partition too then you can resurrect a dead install on a
machine and still have all data intact. :-D

Phil



** Sponsored by http://www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.