[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??
- Subject: RE: TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??
- From: "Nigel Giddings" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:52:25 +0100
I too can confirm that this is all done by the Post Office address
database.
Where I am living I have 4 addresses registered with the Post office, the
original cottage, the new (unfinished) build in the garden, a Studio and an
Annex...
I regularly receive threatening letters for 3 of the addresses, all of
which are put through the same letter box by the postman...
I haven't had a Commer Van pull up in the drive though....
Nigel
_____
From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 June 2006 22:29
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??
> Well, IANAL, but we had this exact same debate at work a couple of
days
> ago, and from all the links and references posted, it appears that a
> licence is required for any device displaying a TV program - not just
a
> traditional receiver.
>
My understanding is that if you have the ability to receive and view
television programs then you should have a licence. Its basically
"just
another tax" that almost everyone has to pay as there are very few
people
who genuinely DONT have a TV.
If you purchase a device whos primary purpose is the reception of TV
programs eg Tuner card, Freeview box, Television etc then the retailer has
to notify the licencing authorities. (Not that you have to prove the
address
you give is valid!!!!)
The TV licence database contains every address in the UK and whether or not
it has a valid licence. The addresses they tend to check up on are those
identified as not having a valid licence. If the address doesnt have any
equipment that would require a licence then they enter that on the computer
and probably recheck every so often.
If an address is submitted by a retailer and the records show no valid
licence they will then become interested.
The adverts with the TV detector vans used to make me laugh. About 25 years
ago when "Post Office Telecommunications" still had
responsibility for radio
interference investigation, I did some overtime driving a TV Detector Van.
What a pile of crap that was.... a pale blue "J" reg Commer van
(1970/71
vintage) and none of the equipment worked. Even the manual windscreen
washer
press broke when I tried to clear the windscreen!!-! We visited several
houses all of which were identifed as not having a licence from the
records.
Every single one of them had a TV.
Regarding the comments made about companies being liable to a fine if
employees watched TV via the internet, I would expect that the majority of
larger companies already have (or SHOULD have) a licence as many of them
will have a TV and video that they use for training purposes which gives
them the ability to view TV thereby making a licence neccessary.
Keith
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/366 - Release Date: 15/06/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/366 - Release Date: 15/06/2006
------oooo0oooo-------
16/6/2006
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|