The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??


  • Subject: RE: TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??
  • From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:28:54 +0100

> Well, IANAL, but we had this exact same debate at work a couple
of days
> ago, and from all the links and references posted, it appears that a
> licence is required for any device displaying a TV program - not just
a
> traditional receiver.
>

My understanding is that if you have the ability to receive and view
television programs then you should have a licence. Its basically
"just
another tax" that almost everyone has to pay as there are very few
people
who genuinely DONT have a TV.

If you purchase a device whos primary purpose is the reception of TV
programs eg Tuner card, Freeview box, Television etc then the retailer has
to notify the licencing authorities. (Not that you have to prove the
address
you give is valid!!!!)

The TV licence database contains every address in the UK and whether or not
it has a valid licence. The addresses they tend to check up on are those
identified as not having a valid licence. If the address doesnt have any
equipment that would require a licence then they enter that on the computer
and probably recheck every so often.

If an address is submitted by a retailer and the records show no valid
licence they will then become interested.

The adverts with the TV detector vans used to make me laugh. About 25 years
ago when "Post Office Telecommunications" still had
responsibility for radio
interference investigation, I did some overtime driving a TV Detector Van.

What a pile of crap that was.... a pale blue "J" reg Commer van
(1970/71
vintage) and none of the equipment worked. Even the manual windscreen
washer
press broke when I tried to clear the windscreen!!! We visited several
houses all of which were identifed as not having a licence from the
records.
Every single one of them had a TV.

Regarding the comments made about companies being liable to a fine if
employees watched TV via the internet, I would expect that the majority of
larger companies already have (or SHOULD have) a licence as many of them
will have a TV and video that they use for training purposes which gives
them the ability to view TV thereby making a licence neccessary.

Keith




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.