The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: TiVo About to Re-launch in the UK


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Any inkjet printers without "chipped cartridge" or cheaper own brand?


  • Subject: Re: [OT] Any inkjet printers without "chipped cartridge" or cheaper own brand?
  • From: "Gary" <questuk1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:55:08 -0000

Thanks any particular model number?

Regards


Gary


--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "John Andrews" <groups@...> wrote:
>
> Gary
>
> I get my friends / relatives to buy Canon, these take third party
cartidges
> and are cheap as chips, normally about 3-4 quid.
>
> The printers are usually good quality too.
>
>   _____
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of
> Gary
> Sent: 26 July 2006 19:47
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Any inkjet printers without "chipped
cartridge" or
> cheaper own brand?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> My epson c64 has given up after only 1 1/2 years and little use.
>
> I did buy a chip resetter and filled perhaps 3 times... but had enough
> of the printer.it eats ink! even when not using it... as every time
> you turn it on, (after few days not using it), it does head
> cleaning... i reckon i got about 30 pages of text out of each
cartridge.
>
> any other printers that don't eat ink even when not used often?
> and hopefully without chip protection...or a good supply of cheap
> cartridges?
>
> Did google on all this but all printers seem to have various problems?
>
> any recommendations?
>
> Regards
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.