[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Netgear SC101 - A tiny problem
- Subject: RE: Netgear SC101 - A tiny problem
- From: "Nigel Giddings" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:20:38 +0100
Tim,
This won't help you but it may help me...
I bought one of these early this year and had no end of problems... I'm
no network Guru but like to think I am at least a sophisticated user...
I tried for weeks to get this to function properly to no avail, don't
even get me started on the support desk...
My problems could have been more to do with Active Directory and Domain
control but my feeling is if it's any more than 2 PCs on a 'Hub' then
the SC101 is not for you....
I'm feeling better already...
Nigel
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Davies [mailto:dajdavies@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 July 2006 14:06
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Netgear SC101 - A tiny problem
I don't think it does 'proper' networking and relies on software of the
client machines to access it instead of stuff like the standard
protocols.
If this is the case I think you might won't be able to use it the way
you
want - what's acting as the VPN endpoint, is it a PC or a router?
Andy
On 12/07/06, Tim Fletcher <timfletcher@xxxxxxx
<mailto:timfletcher%40breathe.com>
> wrote:
>
> I bought one of these a couple of months ago and have been broadly
pleased
> - pretty slow and pretty hot but cheap, convenient and ideal for my
> purposes. One problem is that I can't connect to the NAS drives via
VPN -
> This is not a killer problem, but I had considered "loaning"
100Gb of
my NAS
> to a mate in return for a reciprocal 100Gb of his SC101 NAS - the plan
was
> then to create an offsite backup location and solve all my data
storage
> problems.
>
> Having Googled this it appears I am not alone - can any NAS be used
like
> this? Could the SC101 in the future via a software upgrade? Any ideas
how
> I might be able to do it now?
>
> So near and yet so far...
>
> Tim.
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------oooo0oooo-------
12/7/2006
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|